Questions Listed Under Christian Living

Click on a title or click open the "+" icon to reveal answers to each question.

  • A friend has a problem as to why God allows or maybe the word is "sanctions" killing in declared wars versus an individual killing another? One is punished; the other may be considered a hero.

    The main issue behind the question is motive.

    If an individual kills someone who is trying to kill him or others, this is justifiable homicide. If soldiers practice atrocities or genocide in war, this is evil.

    If the government executes a murderer, this is right. If it knowingly executes a good man, this is murder.

    A war started for evil purposes is wrong. A war to defend the innocent is good.

    It is not the number of people involved but the motive of the action that determines whether it is right or wrong. Governments can be guilty of murder, and individuals can be justified in killing.

  • Recently in our worship service we heard the parable of the rich fool who selfishly built bigger and bigger barns to store all his grain and took life easy. How does this compare with Christians today who save large amounts in IRA’s, 401K plans, etc.? They want to save up enough for retirement so that they can live off the interest. The plan of “not touching the principal” to make sure one doesn't outlive their savings sounds a lot like the rich fool.

    The memorable parable is recorded in Luke 12:13-21. You are correct to note that there are discernible similarities between the behavior of the Rich Fool and many who dedicate great energy to amass large retirement investment portfolios. There are also, however, possible key differences that need to be considered.

    Allowing Scripture to explain Scripture, we learn that having large amounts of money, whether for retirement or for other purposes, is not sinful in and of itself. Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Joseph of Arimathea, and Lydia of Philippi were significantly wealthy people whose relationship with the Lord endured. Looking more closely at how Jesus concluded his lesson in Luke 12:21, we also learn the key fault of the Rich Fool: he stored up wealth "for himself" but was "not rich toward God." He was a spiritual and charitable pauper. He forfeited his soul not merely by having money, but by being cheerfully content to "take life easy" in a self-serving way while alienated from God and his needy neighbors.

    So while we dare not apply this parable to all who faithfully or passionately build retirement investment portfolios, your question remains a valuable one that calls all of us to honest self-evaluation regarding crucial questions like, "How much is reasonably enough for my long-range purposes?" and (especially) "What am I to do with wealth should the Lord give it to me?" The Apostle Paul addressed the central issues of attitudes and purposes in 1 Timothy 6:6-10 and 1 Timothy 6:17-19. Admittedly, the answer to "How much is enough?" may vary from person to person, and the Bible does not provide specific amounts or formulas to allow us to calculate what is proper or improper. But too often greed and lack of confidence in divine providence -- coupled with investment counselors and financial advisors who often make more money by convincing people to amass more money with no regard for biblical priorities -- exert too much influence on zealous savers. The American culture regarding saving and spending seldom reflects the old adage attributed to John Wesley: "Make all you can, save all you can, give all you can." The first two aspects without the third is spiritually and ethically unhealthy.

    Before I would weigh in on particular people's level of savings or wealth, I do well to look at their outward confession (in teaching and practice) regarding their relationship to God through Christ and regarding their support of Gospel work and worthy charitable causes. That tells me about character and integrity much more than any mere balance in a bank account.

  • Is there an example in the Bible that relates to a Christian working for a labor union or any union for that matter? It seems that such employment may be a possibility for me.

    The Bible does not give specific counsel, one way or another, regarding a Christian's membership and active participation in labor unions, trade unions, or professional guilds as such. Modern trade unions are normally traced historically back to the medieval trade guilds, but these kind of groups existed at the time of the Bible (see, for example, Acts 19:23ff.) yet no commands or prohibitions regarding them are given in Scripture. To join or not to join becomes a matter of Christian freedom to be decided on the basis of love, wisdom, motive, and specific circumstances about a specific group and its purposes.

    Religiously, trade unions normally do not require any participation in false worship or a compromise in doctrine and practice as normally defined. Occasionally certain labor organizations (especially local ones) may end up with religious affiliations that spell potential trouble (for example, an assumed membership with the Masonic Lodge may be part of the larger picture). Economically, trade unions (or employers for that matter) need not be guilty of exploitation or loveless oppression, but may end up being guilty of that. Christians need to examine and appraise the guild or union in question and may proceed with an informed and clear conscience.

  • Recently I have learned that my girlfriend is upset about my living situation. I am sharing an apartment with a close friend—a woman that I have had a platonic relationship with for over nine years. From a biblical standpoint is it a sin to live with a friend of the opposite sex?

    At the heart of your question is this one: "Is it always sinful to live with someone of the opposite sex?" And the answer is, "No, it is not always sinful." Circumstances, motives, and the people themselves need to be considered before saying such a living arrangement is to be judged right or wrong—or wise or foolish.

    Theologically we would classify such a living relationship as an adiaphoron, something God has neither commanded nor forbidden. Such a thing lies in the realm of Christian freedom. And that is precisely why you need to give very careful thought to what you choose to do with your freedom. If such an arrangement constitutes a temptation to sin (for anyone), it becomes unloving and sinful. If it gives others the wrong impression or causes others to stumble spiritually or unnecessarily jeopardizes the reputation of a Christian, it is unwise, imprudent, and ultimately unloving and sinful too. The summary statements used by the apostle in 1 Corinthians 6:12 and 1 Corinthians 10:23-24 remain important considerations regarding the use of Christian freedom.

    You say that the woman you have been dating is "upset" about your living relationship. You do not say she accuses you of sin—but you certainly identify an issue that merits your thoughtful attention. The appearance of your behavior to others cannot be casually set aside. A frank, two-sided conversation with your girlfriend is long overdue. And if you think that your living arrangement should not have meant anything to your girlfriend, you are idealistic and probably naive.

    Evangelical practice in counseling requires knowing the people and circumstances much more than I do. Speak with your pastor and other trustworthy friends and acquaintances who know you and will speak lovingly and frankly as people who know the circumstances.

  • My wife and I were poor stewards of the God's gifts and ran up considerable credit card debt. We decided to do first-fruit giving through growth in God's Word and now we have a plan in place to pay off all of our debt. Due to limitations in our finances, it will take us at least 18 months to pay it off. Would it be better to lower our offerings now in order to wipe out the debt faster?

    While the Bible does not identify a particular percentage for first-fruit giving, the priority of "paying God first" is clear and clearly not to be set aside. However, you do not speak of stopping your first-fruit giving but of decreasing the percentage of that giving for a limited time period and for a specific purpose. A fiscal or money management case can be made for this without difficulty. But what potentially hangs in the balance is your conscience. Only you can know that well enough to give the ultimate answer to your question. If you honestly feel this is not the best way to honor your gracious and generous God, do not take this route. Remain alert to rationalizing that does not adequately reflect your new life in Christ.

    When dealing with an uncertain or doubting conscience, pastoral counsel is normally not to do what is contemplated. Stay the course. Protect your conscience. Entrust to God your ability to get out from beneath this burden of debt, and know that he is able to give you stamina and cheerfulness despite the fiscal restraint and challenges that will be a part of the next couple of years. The fiscal pain you feel now (alongside the overriding joy in God's grace and forgiveness) can serve as a healthy reminder of the trouble that financial mismanagement brings with it. In the long run you will be richer for having that lesson learned and ingrained in you during this period of discomfort. Small price to pay!

  • What guidance does the Bible offer Christians about artificial insemination? In what situations is it permissible, and when is it not?

    The two problems with artificial insemination (AI) and related assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are the risk the process may pose to the unborn child and possible violations of the marital relationship by co-mingling of the egg and sperm of unmarried couples. Just because the process has been "modernized" through technology does not remove it from the scrutiny of Scripture which calls upon us to respect life as it exists already at conception (Psalm 51:5) and to honor the family as created by God to be one man and one woman, joined as husband and wife as one flesh.

    Generally AI procedures (often referred to as "in vitro fertilization" or IVF) have a high risk of fatality for the unborn child. Adding a surrogacy component, where the egg or the sperm of a third party is used, makes the situation more complicated and concerning.

    As is often the case in this world of sin, situations like this spiral out of control. Today there are thousands of unborn children cryopreserved as embryos waiting to be implanted. The freezing process also increases the mortality of those children. Add to that the issues of divorce, or parents losing interest in having more children, and many of these cryopreserved children are left for experimentation (i.e., embryonic stem cell research) and/or disposal. That is why "Snowflake Adoptions" have been a last ditch effort to save these children by having the embryos implanted in the womb of an adoptive mother.

    One caution, however, in your approach to this: As stated previously, the concern is the risk to the life of the unborn child and the possible violation of the marriage relationship in the case of surrogacy. To argue that "it is not natural" is precarious. There are many things we do that challenge the "natural" course of things in our lives: a band aid on a wound, medication to control cholesterol or high blood pressure, surgery to open up a clogged artery or repair a broken bone. Being "unnatural" is not the problem. It is when doing the "unnatural" violates principles in God's Word, that is concerning.

    A Christian's two-fold mission is to love God and to love others. No matter what natural or unnatural course of action is being considered, the principle demands us to ask whether our actions, methods and motive seek to glorify God and care for others, or is our first motive to be self-serving. That is why it is commonly stated that in Christian ethics the first issue is motive before considering method.

    For more information, visit www.ChristianLifeResources.com and search for "in vitro fertilization."

  • When youth are baptized, attend Sunday school, receive three years of confirmation instruction (6th-8th grades), and then declare their commitment to Christ as Savior before the congregation, what is their accountability? Are they then excused from trying to put Christ first in their lives due to their tender young age? Many give little time or effort for their Lord. How patient or understanding should the church and parents be when most everything else in their lives comes first? Should we think of it as temporary fruitlessness and just rely on the Proverb, "train up a child in the way he should go and he will not depart from it"?

    You are asking very important questions and you are expressing a concern shared by fellow Christians everywhere when they work with or seek to bring youths to greater maturity in life and in their faith-life. Keep asking the questions, keep talking with the youths (and their parents) about such things, and make a point of speaking with others who have access to youths and share your concerns. Work together to try to make a difference in the specific youths that you have in mind and have access to.

    You ask if they are accountable. The answer is yes. They are accountable to God, to the Christian community, their families, and themselves. Assuming meaningful instruction and assuming they were not allowed to participate in the confirmation ceremony mostly out of mere tradition, they should have a grasp on the basics of law and gospel, should see themselves as justified sinners who are called to lead sanctified lives. And more than that, they should have demonstrated a pattern of worship centered in a public as well as private use of the Word of God over a consistent period of time. At the same time they remain immature in so many ways, surrounded by societal and cultural temptations that  prey upon their emotional and physical immaturity and inexperience, and are sometimes quite self-centered to the point of embarrassment (this is a key trait of immaturity). No wonder David prayed as he did in Psalm 25:7 and no wonder a special admonition of Solomon was directed at youths in Ecclesiastes 12:1. The strong majority of Christian adults need little trouble remembering how shallow, selfish, thoughtless, rebellious, and prone to self-inflicted wounds they were while young. So while youths are and will remain accountable -- and should be held accountable by the church and family -- they also should be receiving our counsel and encouragement and included in our daily intercessions.

    You ask how patient we should be with them. It is impossible to answer that question because our patience and firmness need to be linked to specific youths, not youth in general -- and Christian love will be taking note of the distinctive needs and traits of young people. Careful, loving observation coupled with ongoing encouragements, warnings, rebukes, and mature advice will soon be pretty well equipped to note the difference between youthful folly and open rebellion, between a weak faith and a false, hypocritical faith, between sins of weakness and ignorance versus deliberate sins. We will be more patient with the weak, and less patient with the willful rebel. That's applying law and gospel to others as we want it applied to us.

    The passage you refer to, namely Proverbs 22:6, may serve us well in all this. The verb translated "train up" refers to more than passing on information or bare instruction. It has the picture of dedicating or setting a firm foundation upon which a lifestyle is constructed, parallel to building and dedicating a physical structure. This will involve modeling and mentoring, ongoing communication with love and patience, and not a mere informing of right and wrong. When youths are reared in that kind of environment, when they see and learn from the previous generation in an adequately functional family, a value system is being passed on. That will normally carry the youth through the difficult years of youthful immaturity and will bear all the more fruit to God's glory as the person matures.

  • What does the Bible have to say about wearing tattoos?

    Leviticus 19:28 forbade the Israelites from using disfiguring tattoos as the heathen did.  There is no law about this in the New Testament, so we have no law or rule about it.  Christians should consider the meaning and message that tattoos in general or a specific tattoo may convey.

  • It's been a year since I graduated from college, and I've already had two jobs that were not right for me. How do I find out which career path is right for me and where God wants me to be?

    What you are experiencing is by no means unusual; you have lots of company among recent graduates. And I wouldn't be so sure this past year has been such a failure—it sounds like you have been learning about certain kinds of work and potential careers.

    Perhaps you can go back to the school you graduated from to see if they offer any help for graduates in your situation. I also recommend that you have a number of frank, thoughtful conversations with your family members and closest friends, as well as your pastor. Allow them to lovingly try to identify for you the kind of gifts and abilities, aptitudes, and attitudes they see in you. They might teach you some things about yourself that you did not know or consider thoroughly enough. Christian bookstores usually have a number of books devoted to this subject on their shelves as well.

    When you ask "Where does God want me to be?" you ask a question that is important but not easily answered in a word or two. God providentially governs our lives by opening and closing doors in ways we may not even be aware of. But what he does ask of us is that we dedicate each day to his service and glory, that we resolve to rejoice in his saving love for us in Christ, continue to grow spiritually through the gospel, and renew our desire to love him and our neighbor.

    Then let us serve and labor to the best of our ability—even when it is really a chore or less than what we once dreamed about. Faithfulness and dependability never go out of style. What or who we are is top priority; what we do for a living is not top priority. In time, let us trust God to allow us to find a level of contentment if not joy as we live out our lives as his servants and servants of each other.

  • I know the Bible says that we are not to be a slave to our debtors and to owe no man anything. What exactly does that mean?

    The Bible verse you are thinking about and which some have used to say that any and all indebtedness is wrong is Romans 13:8: "Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law."

    We do not believe that this passage is prohibiting any and all forms of indebtedness because of the immediate and wider context of the words in the Bible. Look at the preceding verse. What has Paul been dealing with in this passage? He has been dealing our responsibility to give what we owe to ruling authorities. "Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor." It is wrong for us to default or dishonestly avoid true obligations. If anyone has a proper expectation of us—if we owe them—then we should pay it.

    The wider context of Scripture does not endorse the concept of all indebtedness being sinful. Those under the Mosaic covenant had borrowing and lending governed, but not prohibited. See Exodus 22:25-27 and Deuteronomy 15:7-8 as sample verses.

    "The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender." (Proverbs 22:7). These words remind us that being in debt may not be sinful, but it is an important issue and calls for wisdom.

Search the Archive

Begin by entering a topic. Then press "GO".

Search the Q&A archive to find answers from WELS seminary professors. Can't find your question in the archive? Submit your own.